The discussion focuses on the introduce that our identity, conduct, knowledge, and senti-ments are either hereditarily acquired, or ecologically earned; that we are inborn animals con-ceived with our identities, or that they are found out by involvement and time. Erikson defines this stage as trust vs.
During this stage,. Home Page Research behaviorism vs humanism. Behaviorism vs. Humanism Behaviorism and humanism are two theories of learning. Both theories are very important, and have many good qualities, which makes it difficult to say that one is better than the other. When it comes to learning, behaviorism does not consider mental processes, rather it looks at our response to stimuli in our environment.
Whereas, humanism sees learning as personal, and is dependent on each individual self. Even though the two theories seem completely opposite of each other, there are some similarities between them pertaining to learning. Behaviorism is explained as behavior …show more content… Behaviorists prefer to study animals because they feel they can be in a more controlled environment.
Humanists disagree with this approach because humans and animals are not the same, and they react differently. Humanists believe that humans, not animals, are capable of thought, reason, and language; therefore animals should not be used in studying human behavior and thought McLeod, Also, when performing studies, behaviorism uses a scientific approach, whereas humanism does not.
The reason humanism uses a non-scientific approach is because it is very difficult to study emotions, feelings, and our consciousness scientifically. Therefore, interviews and other qualitative individual methods are used to study behavior McLeod, Combined with the personality of the individual, and his or her biases, it is easy to see how the various theories of personality came to be.
As knowledge and scientific approaches advance, so do theories researchers develop. Some are based, and expand upon existing theories, and others may be completely new theories that challenge what researchers already understand. As with all theories and practices, there will be strengths and limitations. In regard to personality theories one must determine whether or not the behavior is deterministic or the free will of the individual.
Taking these factors into account, researchers can develop basic underlying assumptions of human behavior and personality traits. Each of these individuals developed theories that form the basic guidelines of understanding human personalities.
These theories complement and contrast one another in various points and concepts, which gives researchers of today different ideas to work with.
On their own, each theory has withstood years of advancements in the field of human personality studies, and have provided vast amounts of research data, and guidelines that researchers use to this day.
Researchers have various theories to choose from in regard to studying human personality and behavior. Researchers may choose to use a humanistic approach, a behavioral approach, or psychoanalytic approach, to name a few. Each approach provides a different set of assumptions, processes, and applications. Two such schools are humanism and behaviorism. Each approach presents a unique way of understanding the human mind and behavior. Simply defined, behaviorism pays attention to the external behavior of humans and ignores the mental processes which are unobservable.
Humanism, on the other hand, looks at the individual as a whole. The main difference between humanism and behaviorism, the two schools of thought, is hence the change of direction from external behavior to the entire being. This article will attempt to describe these two approaches and highlight the differences.
Behaviorism is a school of thought that emerged in the s. Ivan Pavlov, John B. Because we do not create our own desires, or motivations, etc. In this respect, this figure is in the person of the leviathan Hobbes, According to Hobbes, the reason why it becomes easy for people to come to a consensus regarding morality is that there is an inherent quest for peace, which is a result of an opposition of the constant conflicts and hostilities, which is the natural state of the human person.
The social contract comes as a result of a surrender of some of the natural rights for the sake of peace Hobbes, Morality as such does not exist before the making of the social contract. Strictly speaking, human persons have no moral principles; this is because the natural state is that of competition, and where fighting for supremacy is the primary reality.
However, the alternative to hard determinism is Libertarianism. Libertarianism is the act of believing humans are free from determinism and its forms. Libertarians believe that determinism and free will cannot be as one. Moreover, they believe freedom requires indeterminism. Skinner, Freud and Rogers contribute so much in the pool of knowledge in Psychology in areas such as behaviorism, psychoanalysis and self-psychology Munday, Skinner is known as the behaviorist, Freud as psychoanalyst and Rogers as self- psychologist.
In the deterministic stance both Skinner and Frued believes that the behavior of an individual is determined by some preceding factors and therefore it can also be predicted….
0コメント